Current Category is: Negotiation | Select Another Category
Go Back To Category Homepage | View Category Sitemap
Free Information
Home   |   Search   |   Categories   |   Links   |   About Us   |   Contact Us


Games are a Reflection of Behavior


You are standing on a small stage yelling, "What's the name of the game?!"

"Win as much as you can!!!" comes roaring back.

"Who's responsible for your score?!"

"I am!!"

The audience is composed of ninety men, all prisoners in a federal maximum security prison.

One more thing - you're a woman.

For three years, Alicia volunteered every Thursday at FCI (Federal Correctional Institute) in Bastrop, Texas-

"I used my skills as a corporate trainer to help these men learn to shift their perspective on themselves and the world."

"Along the way the prisoners taught me as much, perhaps more, than I taught them."

"In my training business, I use games as a way to break down barriers and shift perceptions. What I came to realize is that your behavior in a game is an exaggerated reflection of your behavior in real life."

Games are an opening to behave true to our natures, to react immediately rather than with a careful response. Depending on the other players, we may monitor our behavior less in a game than in the real world, but we aren't acting differently. In a game there are no emotional holds barred.

In a game, we are allowed to be more right brained than logical. After all, "It's only a game."

Saying something is only a game tends to trivialize its importance. Precisely because we view it as trivial, and of no importance, we can give ourselves permission to let our true natures out.

When we floated this idea before a number of colleagues, several of them told us stories of self-discovery. One woman, a very sweet and kind person in "real life", was known as "the enforcer" when she played hockey in school. Another shared that, when she plays a game against total strangers she becomes "brutal" and highly competitive.

So if our true nature comes out in a game, what can we do with that information?

Can we transform situations so that we can be true to our nature? Can we make a game out of real world situations to allow our true nature to flourish? The obvious example is to view business as a game to be won. This implies competition and a winner take all attitude.

Yet Covey and others have told us about creating win-win situations. Is there such a thing as a win-win game - a game where everyone wins, where no one loses? Can you devise a game where you can put your competitive streak toward a larger goal? Can the proverbial pie be made larger? As someone said to me, to transform from "me winning" to "we winning".

What's the name of the game? Win as much as you can!

Who's responsible for your score? I am!

The game Alicia played with the inmates was called "the handshake game". She had them pair up by size, height and weight and explained the rules. "We'll play the game for 45 seconds. You get one point when your hand taps his hip; he gets one point when his hand taps your hip."

The vast majority of the pairs had a combined score of 0 points. A few pairs scored in the 10 - 20 point range.

But one pair scored 260 points.

The high scorers had realized that the name of the game and scoring responsibility did not define a win-lose (or "zero-sum") game. That is, one person did not win at the expense of the other.

Of course, the entire thing was a set-up. Alicia paired them up by size, height and weight to set the expectation that it was an evenly matched contest. She got them chanting to get their excitement up.

And she neglected to tell them that the pair was a team and the team members' scores would be combined.

"Deliberately I didn't tell them they were supposed to cooperate with their partner. I also never told them who the competitors were."

We all know that a "formal" team must cooperate to win. The revelation here was that by cooperating they could maximize their individual scores.

What's the name of the game? Win as much as you can!

Who's responsible for your score? I am!

The rules say nothing about preventing the other person from getting a high score. The pair who "got it" quickly settled into a rhythm of "one for you and one for me". And they could have kept that up for as long as the game ran. Meanwhile, the other teams were struggling and would have exhausted themselves long before the winners did. And, when the few teams who did spot the pair who "got it" there were charges of "cheating" leveled at them. "We saw what they were doing but thought they were cheating or didn't understand the rules."

The cooperation - competition confusion is nicely summed up in the concept called "the prisoners' dilemma". Two people are arrested for a crime and there is enough evidence to put them both in jail for 1 year.

The police keep them isolated from each other and offer each the same deal: "If one of you talks and the other does not, the snitch goes free and the other one gets 3 years. If you both talk, you both get 2 years."

The partners can work together (by staying silent) and both get only a year in jail. By both defecting from the partnership to work with the police they will both get 2 years.

A single defector will go free while the one who cooperated gets 3 years.

The dilemma is formed by pitting trust against greed. The temptation of greed combined with a habit of competition blinds us to a different perspective.

But don't think that only prisoners are subject to this. When Alicia has had groups of corporate executives play this game, they fall into the same behavior pattern as the prisoners. In fact, in some corporate sessions nobody "gets it".

There seems to be a dichotomy between competing and winning. The idea of cooperating to win seems odd. In fact, we see other players complain that the ones who "get it" are cheating!

What you do depends on your view of the game. If the game is seen as a one-time event, why not be brutal - there will be no consequences. But if this event is one in a series, then cooperation is clearly the better long-term strategy, if only because there will be a chance for the other to get even.

In studies of prisoners' dilemma style games (played for points and not reduced jail time) the players eventually settle into a strategy dubbed "tit for tat". Their actions are saying, "If you cooperate last time, I'll cooperate next time. If you defected last time, I'll defect next time."

Using the word "defect" helps us see the shift - the opposite of cooperating (working on the same side) is defecting to the other side.

The desire to compete and the desire to win are not the same.

Game terminology (strategies, tactics, moves, etc.) is often applied to "serious" parts of life. Because the word game has a connotation of triviality, we sometimes bristle at its use to describe the things that mean the most to us.

What if we kept in mind that 'it's all a game' - would we behave differently?

Philosopher James P. Carse writes in the first chapter of Finite and Infinite Games, "There are at least two kinds of games. One could be called finite, the other infinite. A finite game is played for the purpose of winning, and infinite game for the purpose of continuing the play."

The book's subtitle is "A Vision of Life as Play and Possibility." His premise is that a game is about the relationship between the player.

In the book he characterizes two types of players. Finite players play within the rules, infinite players play with the rules. Finite players play to end the game (with their victory), infinite players play to continue the game (by whatever means they see fit). Finite players play to win, infinite players play to keep playing.

The players who "get it" are playing with the rules looking to transform a finite game into an infinite one.

If this article has intrigued you we encourage you to look at the various "games" that you are "playing" and with whom. Who are your "teammates" and what kind of game are you playing? With increased awareness of our behavior, and the behavior of others, we are able to create a "win as much as WE can" mentality.

© Copyright 2004 Alicia Smith Consulting & Training. All Rights Reserved.

This article was written by Alicia Smith as told to John Satta

Alicia Smith is a Coach and Trainer whose specialty is helping business people to Make Money Now. She has taught over 10,000 people how to improve their business bottom lines. To learn more about her courses, products and services, please visit http://www.AliciaSmith.com


MORE RESOURCES:

The Hindu

Allen: US-Pakistan Military Negotiations 'Very Positive'
Department of Defense
But, he said, reestablishing communications among US, Pakistani and Afghan military leaders is “a very positive step” toward reopening supply routes. “It is a negotiation, and negotiations take time, so I can't predict what the outcome will be and how ...
Toward a Sustainable Peace in Afghanistan: Part IWorld Politics Review
Chicago NATO Summit: Climbing Down the Mountain of Conflict in Afghanistan and ...Chicagomag.com
NATO tries to withdraw from Afghanistan honorably but meddles with conflicts ...PanARMENIAN.Net

all 2,974 news articles »


Press TV

Baghdad Nuclear Talks: Crucial Negotiations On Iranian Nuclear Program Take Off
Huffington Post
But no breakthrough accords are expected in the talks in Iraq's capital, suggesting that all sides are still shaping their strategies and the negotiation process is likely to be long. That could allow US and European allies to significantly tone down ...
McCain, Graham, Lieberman: Exercise Caution In Iran NegotiationsNewsMax.com
Iran Nuclear Negotiations BeginFiredoglake
Iran Isn't Taking the West's First OfferCommentary
660 News -Press TV -Springfield News Sun
all 5,580 news articles »


Negotiations again fail to produce agreement
Portland Tribune
School Board Chairwoman Theresa Delaney Davis confirmed that the board was waiting for a security escort out of the negotiation site, and that the board has increased its offer to $5 million in additional compensation, while the union remained at $7 ...

and more »


TEEA sheds light on T/E negotiations
Main Line
By Alan Thomas The Tredyffrin/Easttown Education Association has apparently broken out of what had become a standard “blackout” policy regarding information about teacher-contract negotiations while in progress.

and more »


Minneapolis Star Tribune (blog)

Board keeps school negotiating tapes private
Minneapolis Star Tribune (blog)
Monserrate was referring to the board's private meetings to discuss labor negotiations. They are an exception to the state's open meeting law that allows boards an opportunity to discuss labor strategy without unions or the general public listening.



Union negotiations with Stacy city liquor staff continue
East Central Minnesota Post Review
By Anne Thom— “Just to let everyone know, Chuck (Lucia) and I attended two meetings of union negotiations. Things are progressing,” Mayor Mark Utecht said at the last council meeting. A third meeting was scheduled for this week.



Hays Daily News

Hays NEA, district settle on 3 negotiation points -5/23/2012, 9:57 AM
Hays Daily News
By JUDY SHERARD Members of the Hays USD 489 district negotiating team and Hays-NEA bargaining team checked off three issues at Tuesday's negotiating session. One was the 100 percent health insurance premium paid by the district, and the other was a ...



Negotiations over dissident Chen Guangcheng offered rare glimpse into how ...
Washington Post
The decision that would launch one of the most intense and improbable negotiations in the history of US-China relations was made in the space of hours — and it was sparked by a series of phone calls to the American Embassy. Chen Guangcheng, the blind ...

and more »


Telegraph.co.uk

Apple, Samsung CEOs to negotiate patent dispute
Macworld (blog)
Although the negotiation sessions next week, which will be refereed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, involve US cases, they could have ramifications for the 47 lawsuits between the two companies in nine other countries. Similar negotiations were ...
Samsung Says It Has Negotiation Options With Apple Including Cross-LicensingiClarified
Judge Asks Apple and Samsung To Sort Out Their Disputes Via MediationMobile bloom News
Samsung Has “Options” In Legal War With AppleITProPortal
SmartHouse -Mac Rumors
all 948 news articles »


Cars UK

Automaker Youngman gives up purchase of Saab
China Daily
STOCKHOLM - Chinese automobile company Youngman had quit the negotiation on purchasing the Swedish car maker Saab with its bankruptcy administrators, reported the Swedish newspaper Daily Industry (DI) on Wednesday. According to a source of DI, ...
Chinese automobile company gives up purchase of Saab: Swedish paperShanghai Daily (subscription)

all 10 news articles »

Google News

Home   |   Sitemap   |   Disclaimer   |   Privacy   |   Contact Us

© COPYRIGHT 2011 BRAINBELLY.COM